CLES / Newstart

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealed the economy has grown by more than initially thought in the first three months of 2024.

Acting as a central battleground in the upcoming General Election, the strength of the UK economy has been found to have grown by more than expected. The figures from the ONS, which were released this morning, show between January and March the economy grew by 0.7%.

The news has been welcomed with open arms as figures released last monthly initially projected it would grow by 0.6%. In addition, a larger economy means extra jobs are created, more tax is paid to the government and workers get better pay rises.

Economists have theorised the growth has happened as a result of higher consumer spending which includes sectors such as hairdressing, banks and hospitality. However, while service growth was revised upwards, increases in manufacturing were revised down on the back of more data being collected.

Danni Hewson, head of financial analysis at AJ Bell, said: ‘It’s the tiniest sliver of improvement but when it comes to UK GDP growth, every little really does help.

‘Growth has been front and centre of party manifestos, even if they differ on the details of how that growth can be achieved. A growing economy creates wealth, puts more money in people’s pockets and ups the amount of tax delivered to the Treasury depleted coffers.’

Nevertheless, while the UK seems to be entering out of a recession, many households aren’t feeling any better off. Earlier this month, the Bank of England made the decision to keep interest rates at 5.25% – the highest they have been for 16 years.

The latest figures on the economy show it failed to grow in April after a particularly wet start to Spring.

Sophie Lund-Yates, lead equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, has claimed that whilst it seems positive the economy is growing the ‘deep-seated productivity problems in the UK are overall a bigger concern than the immediate interest rate outlook’.

Image: Andre Taissin

More on the economy:

The economy appears to be thriving, but is it at the cost of interest rates?

Charity claims investing in social housing could add billions to the economy

The Manningham Housing Association (MHA) employee paved the way for the Bradford-based organisation to become the first in the world to achieve the global standard for diversity and inclusion for HR management.

On 24th June the Housing Hero Awards took place at Manchester Central as part of Housing 2024. At the event, Carolina Padovezi de Oliveira was named as Inspirational Colleague of the Year and to say the award was deserved would be an understatement.

Carolina receiving her award at the ceremony.

In 2019 Carolina joined the MHA as administrative assistant to the executive team before rising to her current role as corporate project manager. She triumphed over nine other finalists at the ceremony in Manchester.

‘Carolina has demonstrated a great ability to blend technology, AI and services to deliver improved customer satisfaction at Manningham Housing Association,’ the Housing Hero judges explained. ‘She is also always willing to share her experiences and successes at Manningham with the rest of sector and demonstrates a high level of professional curiosity and continuous learning.’

Commenting on her win, Carolina said: ‘I am incredibly thrilled and humbled to have won the Inspirational Colleague of the Year award at the Housing Heroes Awards 2024.

‘Manningham Housing Association has allowed me to thrive and learn, and I am so grateful for this recognition. I wouldn’t be able to fly if they had not given me wings.

‘This award reflects our team’s collective efforts and dedication, and I am proud to represent MHA as we continue to drive positive change and innovation within our community.’

As well as Carolina winning an award at the event, ten other finalists were successful. A full list of the winners can be found below:

• Best company health and well-being initiative – Pia Honey from No Floor No More
• Inspirational leader of the year – housing association/council – Ben Laryea from Ekaya Housing Association
• Inspirational leader of the year – independent – Emma Pawsey from Hebron Housing
• Lifetime achievement in housing – Matthew Harrison from Great Places Housing Group
• Outstanding achievement by apprentices – Kynleigh Parker from Lovell Partnerships
• Recruitment campaign of the year – Brighter Futures from Progress Housing Group
• Team of the year – 0-1,000 homes – Hebron Housing
• Team of the year – 1,001-15,000 homes – Young people’s service from Origin Housing
• Team of the year – more than 15,000 homes – Thriving Communities team from Orbit Group
• Tenant of the year – Mandy Buxcey from Portsmouth City Council

Image: MHA

More on this topic:

JJ Rhatigan named top dogs at the 2023 National Building and Construction Awards

Winners announced for the Inspiring Women in Property Awards

It is often said that there is nothing as charming as a beautifully preserved ancient pub. And yet for many within the hospitality industry, the idea of applying for listed building consent to revive an old pub will raise alarm bells.

In this article, I’ll explain how that process isn’t as complex and convoluted as some believe, and my experience of achieving listed building consent for the restoration of an ancient coaching inn.

Dating back to the 1300s, The Mitre is Oxford’s oldest pub. From the days of Chaucer, the Peasants’ Revolt and the Hundred Years war, people have been drinking on the site – initially in a cellar which is still intact today, and later in the 1630s inn built above it. Not only was The Mitre a Medieval drinking establishment, but it is said to have been used as one of the ancient centres of learning which eventually gave rise to the foundation of the University of Oxford.

So it was a disappointment to the city when the pub’s longstanding owners, Lincoln College, closed The Mitre in 2019. But this was necessary to undertake the substantial repairs and renovations to make it fit for continued use. With its stone fireplaces and panelling dating from the 1600s, stucco clad beam with a decorative pattern of exotic pomegranates (possibly dating from the previous century and moved on site), the inn not only has fascinating history but a history which is well-evidenced in its fabric.

In 2022 the building was acquired by Gusto Italian, which committed to a £1.4 million investment, both to preserve the listed features but also to introduce modern design elements unique to the brand. And dining in the Theatre Kitchen or the Dine Under the Olive Trees restaurants today, few would argue that the sensitive restoration has been a success.

A bureaucratic nightmare? Not really – listed building consent doesn’t need to be complex, even in the case of such a highly protected building. But to carry out unauthorised work is a criminal offence which can result in individuals being prosecuted and the work reversed, so it’s important to involve an experienced architect and planning consultant.

It is also important to bear in mind that the Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport’s criteria for listed buildings isn’t limited to specific buildings in isolation, or solely to bricks and mortar: in addition to ‘buildings of importance because of their design, decoration and craftsmanship’ other categories are buildings which ‘illustrate an aspect of the nation’s social, economic, cultural or military history’, ‘demonstrate close historical association with nationally important people or events’ and ‘form part of an architectural ensemble, such as squares, terraces or model villages’: the context and the historical significance can result in a building be listed too.

Listed building consent is obtained though the local planning authority. Once the architect has drawn up the plans, the planning consultant will check whether or not it requires listed building consent and if it does, what the local authority regards as acceptable, which can vary considerably, and therefore whether the plans are likely to achieve consent.

As is frequently the case, the application for listed building consent for the Mitre was submitted along with a planning application for further structural works, with Boyer handling both.

A series of ‘pre-app’ meetings with the conservation office follow prior to the submission of the planning application. The period for determination should take no more than 13 weeks, but varies considerably due to the extent of negotiation with the conservation officer and the requirement for Historic England and other organisations to be consulted. Local residents are also informed and invited to comment.

In most cases, a well-managed listed building consent will be granted by council officers under delegated legislation, rather than doing to a planning committee. Generally speaking, local authorities are keen to see historic buildings brought back into use, their features retained and the building once again making a positive contribution to the built environment. If officers have been actively involved and their advice taken, the outcome is usually positive.

No applicant should feel that listed building consent exists only to preserve or reinstate an ancient building: the purpose of planning is to manage change. The system exists to enable historically significant buildings to continue to have a role, but it doesn’t require that role to replicate its original use precisely. As diners in Oxford’s new Italian restaurant will testify, thanks to changing tastes and trends, hospitality venues are destined to change over time, and the system exists to recognise and facilitate this.

Images: Zoltan Tasi and charlesdeluvio 

More features:

The simple solution to addressing the housing shortage

Levelling up: A progress report from Leeds

Prior to Rural Housing Week representatives from a leading affordable housing provider met with members of Holt parish Council to discuss the importance os such homes across Wiltshire.

Councillor Steve Siddall, chair of the Parish Council, visited the Stonewater – affordable housing provider – site at Station Road in Holt alongside several other council representatives, who were able to witness the range of new homes being built next to an existing housing development.

The new development is littered with ten new one bedroom-masionettes, two-bed bungalows and two- and three-bed homes, which will all be available for social rent for residents, are due to be completed this summer, transforming the derelict old Star Ground.

These properties make up the second phase of affordable properties being built in Holt, the first providing 12 homes in 2012. Both have utilised a rural exeception site, which allows land to be provided below market value for residential development, following Stonewater and the Parish Council identifying the long-term need for rural homes to ensure more young people do not move out of the area.

It seems local morale is very important in this particular area. The homes are being built by local construction firm Winsely White – a rural housing specialist who has previously worked with Stonewater on various other rural schemes. What’s more, they are being completed to Passivhaus standard, meaning they will be energy efficient and have a low ecological footprint.

In addition, solar panels will be fitted, alongside the Wondrwall heating and water system, which uses smart technology to monitor and understand customer energy use to minimise energy usage and reduce bills.

Matthew Crucefix, director of development at Stonewater, said: ‘It was fantastic to welcome representatives from Holt Parish Council to our Star Ground scheme and review the progress taking place. Once complete, the site will provide much needed housing options for local people, which is never more important than in a rural village like Holt.

‘Our vision is for everyone to have the opportunity of a place that they can call home and that shouldn’t be restricted to customers living in larger towns and cities. Affordable rural housing plays a vital part in enabling people to build their lives in smaller communities, which can often be more difficult to remain within or afford, and in turn plays an important part in keeping these rural areas thriving. We look forward to welcoming new customers to these homes.’

Cllr Steve Siddal added: ‘It was wonderful to see these brilliant houses nearing completion. We found this exception site many years ago and it is now blessed with 22 affordable homes for rent for people connected to this village. Stonewater and Winsley White have done an amazing job producing homes of the highest quality proofed for the future with green technology.’

Images: Stonewater 

More on this topic:

Rural housing needs for elderly not being met, report says

Rural affordable housing boosted by the launch of a new scheme

In a bid to promote greener travel the organisation has launched ten new Cycleways across London, adding another 35km to London’s strategic cycle network.

The addition of the new routes takes the total length of  London’s cycle network to 390km. In 2016 that figure was just 90km.

The new routes are:

Folkestone Gardens to New Cross and Greenwich to Lewisham

Two new links to Cycleway 10 (Waterloo to Greenwich) running through Lewisham, adding an additional 3km to the network

Stratford to Woodgrange Park

A new 3km link to Cycleway 2 (Aldgate to Stratford), through the east of Newham

Burnt Oak to Colindale

The first Cycleway in Barnet, connecting two town centres

Chingford to Walthamstow via Ainslie Wood

A new route which connects to Cycleway 24 (Tottenham Hale to Woodford New Road) and beyond to the comprehensive network of Cycleways in Waltham Forest

Chingford to Walthamstow via Highams Park

A new Cycleway connecting the Waltham Forest Cycleways to the north of the borough from Chingford to Walthamstow

Lambeth Bridge to Battersea

An upgrade to this 3km route along Chelsea Embankment and Grosvenor Road and conversion to a Cycleway. This route connects to the Cycleway between Oval and Pimlico

Ealing to Greenford and Ealing to Brentford

Two new links to Cycleway 40, running through Ealing and into Hounslow adding an additional 10km with a connection to Cycleway 9 (Brentford to Hammersmith)

Hanwell to Greenford

A new 3km Cycleway link from Uxbridge Road to Greenford connecting to Cycleway 40 (Greenford to Ealing)

Later this year it is expected that two of the biggest Cycleways in London will open,  Cycleway 9 (Hammersmith to Brentford) and Cycleway 23 (Dalston to Lea Bridge in Hackney), contributing to TfL’s target of having 40% of Londoners living within 400m of a the cycle network by 2030.

Provisional safety data published earlier this month indicates that the number of people injured while cycling in the city fell by 5.7% between 2022 and 2023, during which time the number of daily cycle journeys increased by 6.3% .

Will Norman, London’s Walking and Cycling Commissioner, yesterday said: ‘Expanding London’s cycleway network is key to enabling more Londoners to choose cycling as their mode of transport for shorter trips. These ten new routes connect communities in areas including Stratford, New Cross, Barnet, Walthamstow and Ealing and will support Londoners of all backgrounds and abilities to cycle safely as the Mayor builds a fairer, safer greener London for everyone.’

Image and video: Markus Spiske and TFL YouTube 

More on this topic:

New pedestrian and cycle route set to encourage ‘greener’ travel in the Wirral

£7.2m fund allocated to cycle improvement projects in Leeds

The Development and Planning Authority (DPA) have unveiled plans to zone six new parts of Guernsey for affordable housing but the National Trust of Guernsey said proposals said they would lead to the ‘continued erosion of green space.’

After it was revealed that Guernsey need to act on their affordable homes crisis, the States’ DPA outlined new measures with an aim to addressing it. These include the creation of a Housing Sector Forum made up of people from the states of Guernsey, the construction industry and employers, and zoning six new areas of the island for affordable homes.

However, despite seeming positive on the surface, the National Trust of Guernsey have raised some concerns with the plans.

Olly Brock, planning officer at the trust, said the proposals could end up damaging the character of the land.

‘I think underwhelmed is probably quite accurate from the National Trust’s point of view,’ Brock said.

‘We are concerned that it is an erosion or continued erosion of the green spaces around the island.

‘In my personal view, losing a view of the sky – which is what you get when you put a tall building into place – is less of a problem for me than losing open land that changes the character of our island.’

The six areas that have been earmarked for afford housing include:

• Le Tassin Ruette De La Croix, Castel
• Collingwood, Route Militaire, St Sampson
• School Lane Vinery, Rue De La Vallee, St Martin
• Ville Amphrey, St Martin
• Selbourne Vinery, Route Des Coutanchez, St Peter Port

In addition to trying to build more properties, the plans also include axing a policy requiring large housing developments to provide some affordable housing.

Image: Julie Clarke

More on this topic:

Urban planning incorporating more green space could improve children’s health behaviours

English and Welsh green spaces worth £25.6bn per year

In a devastating turn of events Sir Howard Bernstein, former chief executive of Manchester City Council, passed away earlier this week at the age of 71 after a ‘period of illness’.

Bernstein began his exceptional career in 1971 where he worked at Manchester Town Hall as a £500-a-year junior clerk. He secured the role straight after he left school and quickly rose through the ranks to be appointed head of urban policy where he oversaw the creation and extension of the Metrolink in the 90s. Following this, he became the chief executive of the council.

During Bernstein’s time as chief executive, his efforts can be described as nothing sort of phenomenal. He played a key role in building back the city following the 1996 IRA bomb, led on securing and delivering the 2002 Commonwealth Games, and kickstarted the transformation of East Manchester. It’s safe to say his presence in the northern city will be greatly missed.

Bev Craig, leader of Manchester City Council, said although Sir Howard has physically gone, his spirit will be forever remembered as ‘a driving force in the city’s turnaround form post-industrial decline to the growing, confident and forward-looking city we see today’.

‘He leaves an incredible legacy in the transformation of the city,’ Ms Craig added.

Tom Stanndard, chair of the IED, has also expressed his condolences for Sir Howards death, stating the company’s thoughts ‘are with his close family and friends.’

‘Sir Howard laid the foundations for the creation of the Manchester City Region and everything that has been achieved since through the leading devolution deals that the City has achieved with government,’ Stannard said. ‘There is a sense of loss within all aspects of the economic development and regeneration communities of the City Region. We were privileged to enjoy a number of years with him as our Patron and he will be widely remembered amongst our membership as one of the best in our profession.’

Moreover, Nigel Willcock, executive director of the IED, said: ‘Sir Howard was an important contributor to economic development professionals both in his work generally but also as Patron of the IED. He was a shrewd and visionary leader and undertook all of his work with an understanding of the need of the communities across the city.’

Image: Architects Journal/Sir Howard Bernstein 

Maintenance support, communication strategies and complaint responses are all areas that have contributed to levels being at an all-time low.  

Housemark, a leading data insight company for the UK housing sector, have published their first look at the 2023-24 Tenant Satisfaction Measures (TSM) survey and the results are disappointing to say the least. Experts found satisfaction levels in England have dropped below 70% meaning it is now at a five-year low.

To conduct their research, experts surveyed 22 English landlords on their TSM performance from April 2023 to March 2024 and discovered the decline in service satisfaction dropped from 85.1% in 2018-19 to 69.4% in 2023-24.

Looking at this research more closely, researchers highlighted significant areas that are contributing to such a stark decline in satisfaction levels. Experts found almost a third of tenants are not happy with their repairs service. Repairs are the main point of contact between landlords and tenants. With social landlords recording an average of 3.3 repairs per property – around 14 million repairs across England – the report says this service is crucial for maintaining tenant satisfaction.

In addition, tenants were also found to be dissatisfied with landlords communication. According to the survey, only 58.9% of tenants feel their landlord listens to their views, leaving almost half feeling overlooked.

Moreover, 33.8% of tenants were found to be dissatisfied with their landlord’s to handling complaints, a drop of 15.2% compared to 2022-23. With the data showing a 14.9% rise in average stage one complaint volumes between 2022-23 and 2023-24, the research highlights a possible shift as landlords record complaints formally, in line with the Housing Ombudsman’s Code, instead of using informal mechanisms.

 ‘While some of the headlines in these results are concerning, it’s important to recognise that meaningful improvements in operational services, particularly repairs, typically take around 18 months to reflect in tenant perceptions. This means that efforts initiated now will start showing results in the 2025-26 TSM data. It’s a reminder that sustained effort is crucial for long-term change,’ Jonathan Cox, director of data and business intelligence at Housemark, said.

He continued: ‘While the current TSM results for overall satisfaction are at a low point, our monthly pulse data since April indicates a modest recovery among landlords who have proactively addressed service issues. This is an encouraging sign that positive changes are starting to take effect, and we expect this trend to continue as more landlords implement improvements.’

Although Housemark’s data highlights tenants upset with housing services, the research also shows investment to improve services will start to be reflected in scores after around 18 months.

Image: Erik Mclean

More on this topic:

MPs urge government to protect tenants from health impact of poor housing

Training videos have been released to highlight social housing tenants rights

There’s a very important first step that needs to be taken in resolving the housing crisis: we need a greater understanding of public sentiment around the Green Belt, and a moderate adult conversation to replace the politicking and propaganda.

Of the many issues impacting on the building of new homes, the Green Belt is perhaps the most contentious. Yet the majority of people, if asked whether they would choose a resolution to the housing crisis or an expansion of the Green Belt would probably choose the former.

Furthermore, addressing the housing shortfall, does not require for the Green Belt to be reduced, simply reviewed. It is a lesser known fact that the Green Belt was actually increased last year despite 235,000 new homes being permitted.

A review would make much better use of less attractive areas the Green Belt. Keir Starmer has recently referred to this as the ‘Grey Belt’. In reality there is no ‘belt’ of disused petrol stations and quarries – it’s a much more complex picture whereby large areas of Green Belt are speckled with grey dots.

However, the principle is a sensible one: identifying areas ripe for development. At the same time there is a strong case for identifying and protecting valuable greenfield land including national parks, agricultural land and woodlands, which are rightly appreciated. In fact a review of the Green Belt need not mean a reduction of the Green Belt, simply a change in its boundaries.

This straightforward approach would appeal across the political and demographic spectrums.

Statistics show how public perception has become distorted. For example, the public believes that 47.1% of England is developed; it’s actually just 8.7%.

In contrast, 12.6% of England is protected by Green Belt, which is increasing year on year. The Green Belt around London is three times the size of the city itself. And there is also substantial Green Belt land around 16 of England’s towns and cities including London, Manchester, Birmingham and Liverpool.

Furthermore, contrary to public belief, not all Green Belt land free to be enjoyed by the public: roughly one quarter accessible (only 9.3% of which is allocated as National Park) and the vast majority is privately owned farmland.

The ‘threat’ to the Green Belt has long been a rallying call for campaigners against new development, with a suggestion that the country’s Green Belt is under threat as never before. But again, the statistics paint a very different picture. In 2023, the area of Green Belt land in England, at 1,638,420 hectares, was its highest in twenty years.

I believe that if people understood the impact of ‘protection’ they may see it differently. Far from the vision of a bucolic ring of verdant countryside open to all, much of the Green Belt is unappreciated and underutilised, often previously developed brownfield land. Even the CPRE has put on record that of the 60,714 ha Nottingham and Derby Green Belt, 36% is ‘neglected’.

It’s important to consider how the benefits of the Green Belt can be delivered closer to people’s homes, specifically the inclusion of high quality natural landscapes within and around residential

developments which addresses both sustainability and social objectives. Many new developments now do so very effectively – infinitely more so than the housing developments of the 80s and 90s. And the new requirement that new developments achieve a 10% biodiversity uplift is a step in the right direction.

Even Tony Juniper, the chair of Natural England, has stated that building on the green belt should be part of the UK’s answer to the housing crisis, provided more effort is also put into improving the quality of urban green space. In a Guardian article in November he explained that new housing and better protection for green spaces, wildlife and nature should not be seen as opposites. He explains that the ‘oppositional mindset’ that sees the two as ‘binary choices’ does not reflect reality and that, ‘Putting woodlands in remote areas is going to have much less social benefit than putting woodlands in areas next to where people live.’

The fact is that housing developments which achieves biodiversity net gain through tree planting, new wildflower meadows and habitat creation provides significantly more environmental value than agricultural land and are significantly more accessible.

This position is supported by think tanks left and right: the Adam Smith Institute and the Institute of Economic Affairs have argued that the release of at least some Green Belt land could help solve the housing crisis, and the Institute for Economic Affairs has stated that the existing restrictions ‘significantly push up the cost of living, while making homeownership unattainable, forcing people into lower-paying jobs and increasing commute times and pollution’.

With housebuilding believed to be at its lowest level since the Second World War and affordability compounded by high interest rates, high build costs, labour shortages and the removal of Help to Buy, a solution to the housing crisis is urgently needed. Of course a Green Belt review is not a panacea, but since the issue has become one of the emotive issues in what has become an unnecessarily emotive debate, some more moderate dialogue would be an important step in the right direction.

Image: ZACHARY STAINES

More on the housing crisis:

Addressing the UK’s housing crisis: A look into CMA’s housebuilding report

New recommendations proposed to help communities through the housing crisis

Jane Bennett tragically died of lung disease on 8th June 2023 and following her death a coroner has ruled exposure to toxic mould could have contributed to her passing.

Prior to her death, Bennett, who lived in a council owned bungalow in Mansfield, was admitted to hospital four times in the same month for breathlessness and a cough, which she believed could have been linked to the mould in her property. What’s more, a prevention of future deaths report was issued before the inquest into her death, warning there was a ‘risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken’.

Meanwhile, inspections of other council homes in the area have also been ordered.

Before moving into the bungalow, Bennett lived in a flat but had to move due to her mobility issues and a report found that her health deteriorated after moving into this property. Moreover, Dr John Hutchinson, a consultant at King’s Mill hospital who treated her for lung disease, wrote a letter to Mansfield District Council raising concerns about the impact of mould on her health.

Although, in a devastating turn of events, Bennett’s condition declined and she died two days after the letter was written, meaning it was never sent.

In court, officials were told that Bennett had two large dehumidifiers in her property in an attempt to control the mould problem and had made more than eight complaints to the council. Bennett flagged problems such as a leaky door, celling and radiator – all issues that could have caused the severe mould outbreak.

Nevertheless, Jill Finnesey, head of housing at Mansfield council, said the authority had ‘responded to Jane’s requests’ and carried out necessary work in her home.

She told the inquest: ‘In terms of doing everything we can as a landlord, I feel like we have made every attempt to do that quickly.’

Unfortunately, cases like Jane Bennetts are not unlikely in today’s climate. According to government figures, in England, there are around two million people currently living in homes with significant damp and/or mould problems. With the General Election now just around the corner, members of the public and housing experts are hoping that whoever makes it into Parliament in July seriously prioritises the need to deliver good quality social homes.

Image: boris misevic

More on this topic:

Ombudsman orders hefty compensation after family left in damp and mould for years

Councils find 1,100 private rented homes with dangerous damp and mould

On Thursday the Supreme Court in London ruled that planning bodies must account for burning of extracted fuel when considering site proposals.

With support from Friends of the Earth, Sarah Finch, a local resident, brought the case against Surrey County Court who had given the greenlight for a new development on land close to Gatwick Airport. Ms Finch claimed the project was given the go-ahead without conducting a sufficient environmental assessment.

The new development was an oil drilling project at Horse Hill and was originally granted planning permission in 2019.

As well as highlighting environmental damage, Ms Finch also drew upon the council’s previous declaration to the climate emergency – when a local authority acknowledges they need to act on the causes and impacts of climate change – in her case.

Friends of the Earth, who acted as a legal intervener, said the landmark ruling means the landscape around the granting of planning permission for fossil fuel extraction has been changed. As we advance, it will become increasingly difficult for developers to get consent – individuals must now consider indirect effects that could come from emissions with new developments.

It should be noted that the decision from the Supreme Court does not prevent public bodies from approving new schemes with a big climate impact, but it strengthens the case for refusal.

Katie de Kauwe, Friends of the Earth lawyer, said: ‘Gas, oil and coal companies have been fighting tooth and nail to avoid having to account for all the climate-harming emissions their developments cause. Now, the highest court in the country has ruled that planning permission for an oil project was granted unlawfully because there was no consideration of its full climate impact.

‘This judgment will make it harder for new fossil fuel projects to go ahead. They can no longer claim that downstream emissions are someone else’s problem. Now, when fossil fuel companies apply for planning permission, it follows from the Supreme Court’s judgment, that the end-use emissions must be considered by the planning authority.’

Going forward, the future of previously proposed developments such as a new coal mine in Cumbria hang in the balance. More about such affecting the environment can be found at our sister title’s Air Quality News and Environment Journal.

Image: Francais a Londres

More on this topic:

New-builds face being scrapped over river pollution fears, investigation finds

Government commissions review into rail air quality standards

Analysis of government data shows the number of pubs closing has skyrocketed during the first three months of this year, prompting campaigners to call on the next government to save our watering holes.

The figures show the number of pubs in England and Wales – including vacant ones and those being offered for let – dropped to 39,162 at the end of the first quarter of 2024 to 31st March. At the end of last year, the figure stood at 39,401.

Commenting on the statistics, Sacha Lord, the night-time economy advisor for Greater Manchester, told The Morning Advisor: ‘Our pubs are vital to our communities, our tourism and our economy and this data is a stark reminder of the devastating impact that the cost-of-living crisis is having on venues, particularly the smaller, independent pubs.’

‘Food inflation, increasing supplier costs, unsustainable energy bills, rising rents – the financial burden on hospitality is all-encompassing,’ Lord added. ‘Customers may be coming in, but the costs of operating are simply too high, and we must continue to bring attention to the plight of landlords across the country.’

Experts found that establishments in the North West are among the worst affected. During the first quarter of 2024 the region lost 35 pubs, and some were converted into other services such as offices, day nurseries or homes.

Lord said that loosing pubs in this area is particularly upsetting as the North West ‘has one of the most vibrant night time economies in the UK’.

Lord remarked: ‘This is a clear signal that the current package of support being given to the sector is unsustainable. The incoming government must recognise this as an urgent priority or risk further significant job losses across the sector.’

Sacha Lord isn’t alone in her worries for pubs across England and Wales. Following the publication of the figures, Campaign for Pubs – the UK grassroot campaign speaking for institutions – launched #PledgeforPubs which is calling on candidates in the upcoming General Election to save pubs should they get into Parliament.

The campaign group have outlined six key policies that the next Prime Minister should prioritise, which include:

• Giving pubs better protection
• Introducing an energy cap for businesses
• Create fair tax for pubs
• Stop the pubco rip-off and the abuse of the tie
• Introduce a community right-to-buy
• Create a competition and markets authority review of the UK beer and pub sector

Dawn Hopkins, vice-chair of the Campaign for Pubs and a publican in Norwich said: ‘Now is the time for election candidates of all parties to make a commitment to pubs, publicans, and small brewers. With 80 pubs a month closing, it cannot be denied any longer that pubs and publicans are not receiving the help and support desperately needed.

‘There needs to be targeted help for to get through the cost-of-living crisis, starting with an energy cap for businesses to deal with extortionate energy bills as well as a complete overhaul of business rates, to deal with the unfair way pubs are taxed.  The next Government must also reform the planning system, to stop the cynical buying and selling of pubs as development opportunities and to allow pubs to continue as a pub, where there is a buyer at the independently assessed value as a pub.’

Paul Crossman, chair of the Campaign for Pubs and a publican in York, added: ‘The Campaign for Pubs is calling on all election candidates to back the #PledgeforPubs and to commit to the key policies that will actually help pubs through the cost-of-living crisis and stop the unnecessary closure and loss of viable pubs up and down the country.

‘We need a government that will act to end to the systematic corporate profiteering and wealth extraction that continues to afflict thousands of pubs across the UK, and that will put real planning protection in place to end the pillaging of our remaining precious national pub stock by rapacious developers whose only interest is a quick profit.’

Image: Dovlet Hojayev

More on the future of pubs:

Cheers!: Brewery giant to invest £39m in reopening pubs

Justice for pubs: planning laws must change to protect historic buildings 

The debate over the Green Belt, and the newly branded ‘grey belt’, has made the headlines a lot recently and will remain at the forefront of development decisions due to the two major parties’ diametrically opposed views on the topic. 

For the time being, however, the Green Belt (rightly or wrongly) will remain sacrosanct as the current government prioritises ‘gentle density’ in urban areas in preference to greenfield development.

So what impact is this likely to have on cities? Can a renewed approach to densification support regeneration, especially for those areas which may lack the necessary quantum footfall?

Density – more specifically, ‘gentle density’ – a central theme of the revised NPPF, which is currently being consulted upon. The changes to the NPPF were in large part a response to a rebellious group of anti-development backbench Tory MPs who threatened to torpedo the progress of the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill. And so some big-ticket changes, including removing mandatory housing targets and tightening up on Green Belt development, were made. 

Many in the development sector question whether the rather vague and unquantifiable concepts of ‘beauty’ and ‘gentle density’ were thrown into the NPPF as a means of stalling proposed new developments for political purposes. For stall them they will; they are terms open to such subjective interpretation that they will tie decision-makers in knots even more than they already are. 

To understand whether ‘gentle density’ can help, rather than hinder, the quality and quantity of new developments requires a definition – as it hasn’t had a place in the planning lexicon until now. That’s where the problems start. ‘Density’ is relatively straightforward as it can be measured in quantifiable terms; a relatively simple function of homes and site area. ‘Gentle’ means very little in a planning context but its function, on any plain reading, is clearly to limit density rather than increase it. The deceit in the wording is it purports to enable a higher volume of housebuilding, while also giving leeway to appease the ‘beauty brigade’ as necessary. (‘Beauty’ however, is even more problematic in planning terms: it is subjective, unquantifiable and very much in the eye of each beholder). 

The notes which accompany the NPPF make some attempt to quantify ‘gentle density’: they state that, ‘Small sites play an important role in delivering gentle density in urban areas, creating much needed affordable housing, and supporting small and medium size (SME) builders’. They go on to be more specific about density, ‘Local planning authorities should identify land to accommodate at least 10% of their housing requirement on sites no larger than one hectare; unless it can be shown, through the preparation of relevant plan policies, that there are strong reasons why this 10% target cannot be achieved.’

The guidance also places renewed importance on upwards extensions: ‘Building upwards in managed ways can help deliver new homes and extend existing ones in forms that are consistent with the existing street design, contributing to gentle increases in density… local planning policies and decisions should consider airspace development above existing residential and commercial premises for new homes. This includes allowing upwards extensions where the development would be consistent with criteria relating to neighbouring properties and the overall street scene, as well as being well-designed and maintaining safe access and egress for occupiers.’ More specifically, it encourages the introduction of mansard roof windows: ‘In some locations, local planning authorities have been reluctant to approve mansard roof development, as it has been considered harmful to the character of neighbourhoods. As a general approach, this is wrong – all local planning authorities should take a positive approach towards well designed upward extension schemes, particularly mansard roofs. It is proposed that a reference to mansard roofs as an appropriate form of upward extension would recognise their value in securing gentle densification where appropriate.’ In my view, this continued idea that building mansard roofs, or indeed the fascination with ‘airspace’ development can make any significant dent in the housing shortage is a wishful/fanciful case of burying heads in the sand and a means of avoiding the tough conversation about proper development on the ground. There is scant evidence that airspace development is actually working.

It seems a step too far for planning policy to identify specific architectural features such as mansard windows as ‘well designed’ and to state that considering them harmful to the character of neighbourhoods is ‘wrong’, as it is commonly accepted that whether any architectural feature is ‘right’ or ‘beautiful’ depends upon the context. 

My view is that good design is closely linked to good land use. In most situations, and especially in urban areas, density has many advantages. We have an indisputable shortage of homes which is best addressed by providing an optimal number of homes on all available land; that’s Chapter 11 of the Framework which seeks to make efficient use of land. Doing so helps create a mixed and balanced community, increases the potential for a range of facilities in close proximity, is economically advantageous (allowing resources to be spent on services and amenities) and can facilitate greater variety of uses, such as live/work and co-living. Denser schemes also have the potential to be more sustainable, not least in terms of sustainable transport, if located close to public transport or withing easy each of local services. Developable land, especially in cities such as London where I am based, is a scarce resource and it is essential that potential development capacity is not wasted.

I would like to think that these changes would have little bearing on my work because, working with my colleagues in Boyer’s design team, we already produce schemes which are well designed and make good use of available land. But I fear that tenuous terms such as ‘beauty’ and ‘gentle density’ despite meaning very little in planning terms, have the potential to result in major schemes being called in and refused permission, exacerbating our current housing crisis.

Image: Pedro Lastra

More on this topic:

Rejected homes find a space on Hertfordshire Green Belt

England’s green belt could clear the way for 73m new homes

With the General Election fast approaching there’s no doubt new levelling up pledges will soon make their way through Parliament. In light of this, Sarah cox, partner at Carter Jonas, examines current progress in Leeds. 

When the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill was published just over two years ago, the draft legislation – originally heralded in the 2019 Conservative Party manifesto as the answer to economic imbalances across the UK – was received with scepticism in the context of political hiatus and the Chancellor’s announcement of ‘eye-watering’ and ‘painful’ austerity. So in the days before a General Election, how successful has Levelling Up proved to be?

Following the sooner-than-expected enactment of the legislation in October last year, it is interesting to consider to what extent the Levelling Up and Regeneration Act (LURA) has met, or has potential to meet, its objectives.

The levelling up agenda began with twelve missions to be achieved by 2030: increased pay, employment and productivity; public investment outside the south-east; London-style public transport connectivity across the country; nationwide broadband; fixing the education gap; skills training; narrowing the life expectancy gap; increasing wellbeing; decreasing inequalities; a rise in first-time homebuyers; crime reduction, and devolution in England.

I am pleased to say, tentatively, that the Act has facilitated the potential to make a real difference here in Leeds.

While the majority of these objectives are yet to be met, the most important building block in now in place – devolution. Public transport connectivity is finally becoming a very real possibility and this (combined with other initiatives and investment) is set to result in economic growth.

In March this year, the strategic case for West Yorkshire’s Mass Transit Phase 1 was considered by West Yorkshire Combined Authority (WYCA). The proposal maps the first of four phased corridor projects to be delivered by 2040. These are East Leeds, South Leeds to Dewsbury, Bradford to Leeds and Bradford to Dewsbury. Over time, it is intended that the new tram network will extend further, to Pontefract, Wakefield, Halifax and Huddersfield.

The creation of a greener, more inclusive and better connected transport system will undoubtedly support economic development. The benefit to the business community, specifically those business located on the new routes, will be considerable. And so too will be impact on local communities: it is projected that 675,000 people within the top 20% most deprived communities within West Yorkshire will benefit from significantly improved public transport.

There have been some concerns about the proposed route, primarily that it does not link the airport and other some neighbourhoods which were crying out for better connections. But hopefully this is just the start of a longer term investment in the region – which, overall, is pleased to finally have a strategic transport proposal.

Another key component in Leeds’ journey towards levelling up is the announcement in the March Budget of A vision for Leeds: a decade of city centre growth and wider prosperity.

Again the product of WYCA, together with Leeds City Council and the Department for Levelling Up, the document, the proposals include:

• A new Leeds Transformational Regeneration Partnership, bringing together national, regional and local government to deliver the vision and unlock the delivery of up to 20,000 new homes
• Plans for transformational regeneration across six key city centre neighbourhoods: Mabgate, Eastside & Hunslet Riverside, South Bank, Holbeck, West End Riverside and the Innovation Arc
• Investment in transport infrastructure to revolutionise connectivity across West Yorkshire
• Recognition of cultural anchor institutions for regeneration and growth in Leeds, including the British Library North and National Poetry Centre

These proposals are at an early stage. But are good news for our city and wider region because they clearly recognise its substantial untapped potential.

Carter Jonas has been closely involved in several of the projects referred to in the Government document, including the Old Medical School, a Grade II* listed Victorian building which is being redeveloped following the opening of a new pathology lab at St James’ University Hospital and The British Library North, which aims to deliver a new 8,000m2 British Library facility in a Grade I listed building, Temple Works, within the South Bank area of the city. We look forward to seeing the benefit of these, and other schemes as development inevitably picks up pace.

In common with most of the country, West Yorkshire has a housing shortage. This has been compounded by frustrations within the planning system which have stalled development and impacted affordability, both in the sale and rental sectors.

But the commitment to deliver up to 20,000 new homes is genuinely deliverable, partly because communities the north are generally in favour of suitable, sustainable growth. Furthermore, the Mass Transit system will open up new inner city brownfield sites and make out-of-town schemes more viable, while also giving landowners greater confidence in releasing land for development.

There is no question that the West Yorkshire Combined Authority will be the main facilitator of economic growth. One of the key components of ‘levelling up’, devolution has strengthened the powers of the WYCA. In May 2021, Tracy Brabin was elected Mayor of West Yorkshire and together, the Mayor and WYCA have already demonstrated that they can provide the comprehensive overview necessary to enable region-wide discussions, joined up thinking and a strong force with which to lobby Government.

The announcements to date are just a small step in the long process of bringing greater prosperity to the north. But devolution, a transformative public transport system and funding for homes, neighbourhoods, cultural investment and a regeneration partnership are the blocks upon which levelling up can succeed in the medium to long term.

Invariably there will be challenges, not least in relation to inadequacies in the planning system and a severe shortage in local authority funding. But 2024 has already seen some significant commitments to the north’s untapped potential and I look forward to it being realised.

Images: Gary Butterfield

More features:

Should you re-open your Housing Revenue Account?

The property sector should prepare for a Labour government

Despite inflation rates reaching the 2% mark the Bank of England have confirmed interest rates will remain at 5.25%.

Figures published by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) yesterday show inflation has fallen to 2% as a result of food prices increasing at their slowest rate since July 2021. In addition, officials added that core inflation, which executes volatile elements such as food and energy prices, fell to 3.5% in May.

Whilst this news seems positive on the surface, Martin Sartorius claimed many households will still experience squeezed budgets. When the inflation figures were released, Sartorius claimed it could encourage the bank of England to ‘cut interest rates’ but added ‘rate-setters will still need to weigh the fall in headline inflation against signs that domestic price pressures, such as elevated pay growth, are proving slower to come down.’

However, today at 12 noon officials from the Bank of England confirmed interest rates will remain at 5.25% – the highest they’ve been since the financial crash in 2008.

The decision from the Bank came as data from ONS found services inflation was 5.7% in May, which was only a reduction of 0.2% from April. Although the news will be welcomed by savers, it will come as a huge blow to people who are already struggling to pay back their mortgage loans and those who need to refinance their loans over the next few months.

In addition, analysts have revealed that prices for food, energy, clothing and rents are all around 20% higher than they were three years ago and for some, mortgage payments have doubled. The latest research from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation – a charity working to help people facing poverty – shows five million families on the lowest incomes have had to go hungry or cut back on food so they can afford household bills. The charity also found that seven in 10 low-income households in the bottom 20% were going without essentials in May this year.

On a more positive note, experts from the Bank have hinted at an August cut. A report from the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) read: ‘As part of the August forecast round, members of the committee will consider all the information available and how this affects the assessment that the risks of inflation persistence are receding.’

The news of inflation and interest rates has come just two weeks before the next General Election and, for the first time, British households are poorer in real terms at the end of a Parliament than they were at the start in 2019.

Image: William Warby

More on this topic:

UK inflation has dropped to 3.2% which isn’t good news for interest rates

Inflation: Figures remain steady but families will still have to go without

National property consultancy Carter Jonas has secured planning and listed building consent on behalf of a private landowner for the conversion of a range of redundant farm buildings into seven houses.

One of the main reasons planning consent was granted was due to the schemes positive approach to heritage preservation and design. A manor house, of which the garden adjoins the site – which lies within the Horningsea Conservation Area and is adjacent to the Green Belt and open countryside – is Grade II listed and therefore the farm buildings are ‘curtilage listed’, meaning Class Q permitted development rights (for change of use from agricultural to residential) did not apply.

Screenshot

Furthermore, under Policy Section 11 of the South Cambridgeshire Local Plan, residential development, even in the form of redevelopment, in Horningsea is normally restricted to two units.

What’s more, news of this new development has come just as planning red tape has been slashed for farmers. New planning rules have been implemented to make it easier to convert unused farm buildings into new homes, farm shops and gyms.

However, not everyone has been in favour of the new plans. The planning application was recommended for refusal by the council’s planning officers although the planning committee were supportive of the scheme and the Parish council lent it’s support.

The local ward councillor requested that the applications should be determined at planning committee rather than delegated to officers. As a result, and following substantial support from local residents and neighbours, the recommendation for refusal was overturned and the committee voted unanimously in favour of the project.

Colin Brown, head of planning & development at Carter Jonas in Cambridge said: ‘It is rare for committee members to overturn officers’ clear recommendations for refusal. So when it does occur, it is a real triumph.

‘With a local and national housing crisis worsening by the day, good quality conversions such as that proposed here should not be passed by lightly. While this example highlighted contradictions in local planning policies, I very much hope that planning officers will have regard to it in securing the optimal use of redundant agricultural buildings in the future.’

Tim Jones, head of rural at Carter Jonas, added: ‘Our client is delighted that the planning committee of South Cambridgeshire District Council took the trouble to consider the planning application in detail and understand its real benefit.

‘The farm buildings are no longer fit for their original purpose, and we are all delighted that they can now be converted to high quality homes for people to enjoy.’

Construction is due to commence on site by the end of the year and the scheme is anticipated to complete within 12 months.

Image: Carter Jonas 

More on this topic:

Shared homes demand comes from a drive in local industry jobs

£9m awarded to Norfolk councils to restart housing plans

Ahead of the General Election Places for People have conducted new research which shows almost two thirds of the UK population would welcome new housebuilding within five miles of their home.

The UK’s leading social enterprise, Places for People, polled 4,000 people from a balanced mix of housing circumstances, financial income, age and sex to understand what the public want to see from the next government in regard to housing.

Experts, who published the research earlier this week, discovered 63% of the people surveyed are supportive of new affordable and social housing in their area, but 58% are concerned about the strain it would put on local services. As a result, 71% claimed there should be more upfront investment in local infrastructure projects, such as schools, doctors’ surgeries and hospitals so they can accompany new properties.

However, whilst the research highlighted what the public want to see from the government it also outlined regional variance in attitudes. Individuals living in areas with higher house prices – such as people from the South East and South West – were found to be more likely concerned about the strain new housebuilding would put on existing services. In contrast, devolved nations were the least likely to be worried about the impact.

Likewise, people who rent were less likely to be concerned about infrastructure delivery (63%) than those who own their own home (76%).

Commenting on the research, Dinny Shaw, head of planning at Places for People, said: ‘There is a clear appetite for not only new housebuilding, but new communities from the UK public.  We want to create thriving new communities, along with community infrastructure, but this cannot be done without deliverable planning permissions.

‘Before we talk about a housing crisis, we have a planning crisis, and it’s getting worse.  Only 21% of Local Planning Authorities adopted a Local Plan in the last 5 years.  In the last 12 months only 10,406 sites were granted planning permission, the lowest number since 2006, and it’s taking an average of 28 weeks for any proposal to make it through the system.

‘Long term, we need a clear framework in place that unlocks more land for new homes and delivers planning consents needed to support future growth in housing delivery.’

Shaw added that in the short-term, ‘we need to see a new government invest in local planning authorities, set a clear direction and policy framework to speed up decision making, and invest to unlock sites that are caught up in viability issues.’

Image: Pasi Jormalainen

More on this topic:

Places for People pen ‘UK’s biggest’ modular housing deal

Places for People chief executive to retire

Planning, by its very nature, concerns the future. As such, it could be argued that those afforded the greatest influence in planning should be those with the greatest stake in the future – the young. 

When the government announced ambitious long-term plans for London, Cambridge, Leeds and other urban areas last July (and made further funding commitments in the Spring Budget), it was immediately apparent that that plans for growth must include a younger representation.

With the average age of a first time buyer being 34, most buying their first home on these new settlements and urban extensions will be at primary school today. Some are not yet born; others may be old enough to contribute to the vision for their city – but do they feel empowered to do so?

There is undoubtedly a need for younger voices in planning discussions, especially considering that new homes tend to attract a younger demographic, and yet the planning applications for that much-needed housing are frequently defeated by planning committees – committees more often than not comprising an older, home-owning demographic, potentially with a vested interest in resisting house building as a result, maintaining high house prices.

The problem is that the planning system simply isn’t set up to engage with those who are not yet on the housing ladder – which tends to be the younger demographic. For many under 35, the prospect of home ownership seems so distant that they are unlikely to engage with the planning process or shape future proposals for residential development. .

This is partly because young people, especially those who are renting, tend to be more mobile. They will not necessarily buy in the area in which they are currently renting, which further reduces the likelihood that they will take part in discussion on development proposals. Figures from the RTPI state that the majority of those who engage in planning are aged over 55; that response rates to a typical pre-planning consultation are around 3% of those directly made aware of it, and for Local Plan consultations, the number is even lower, at less than 1% of the population.

There are many practical reasons for this lack of engagement among the young. For example, planning committees tend to be held during the day when most are at work or caring for children; information about planning applications and consultations is often confined to notification letters sent to existing neighbouring residents and notices in local newspapers – not the headlines which might possibly appear on social media but instead, the small ads which are located towards the end of the print editions – and readership of all newspapers in the UK dropped by two thirds between 2005 and 2021, according to Statistica.

There is so much progress to be made. Councils’ requirements of consultation should go beyond newspaper advertisements, posters on lampposts and communication with parish councils, for example. Technology offers an alternative and an opportunity for a broader reach, but even so, the average Facebook user is now in their 30s. TikTok and other social media platforms may be the means by which many young people engage online, but has such social media ever been used successfully to publicise a planning consultation?

A further issue is that the planning system is skewed towards existing homeowners who are more likely to object to an emerging development proposal or local plan, as they are often directly affected due to their proximity. Neighbour notification letters sent to existing properties close to a

development proposal, a small notice in a local newspaper, or consultation with a parish council are unlikely to reach beyond existing local residents and garner any support. Those most in need of new housing are unlikely to be the recipient of a neighbour notification letter, so how can they be expected to be aware and offer support for a development?

It is a factor of all feedback mechanisms – from restaurant reviews to planning consultations – that those more likely to make an effort to respond are those with a strong objection, rather than those accepting of or indifferent to proposals. Furthermore, a planning system disinclined to elicit responses naturally exacerbates this situation and skews perceptions. Letters of support to local planning authorities, either in relation to development proposals or emerging Local Plans, are few and far between and are typically significantly outweighed by the volume of objections.

The ability of the planning system to reach younger people has traditionally lagged behind that of other sectors despite the fact that young are those most affected by the changes. Perhaps these is an opportunity for the planning and development sector to learn from other sectors, and the large scale city visions present the ideal opportunity to put this into practice.

Image: Elevate

More on this topic:

Places for London urging young people to work in the built environment

‘Pioneering’ town project launched to target alarming unemployment rates in young people

Cheltenham Borough Council have given the greenlight for Taller Developments to construct a ‘Bond-villain lair’ style home on a derelict reservoir.

Proposals for the site include developing the redundant former Severn Trent Water subterranean reservoir into a contemporary six-bed home. The property will sit below the surface of the existing buried structure and will be accessed via the existing access point to the site, from Leckhampton Road.

On the surface, plans for the new property replicate that of a Cluedo home – it is set to include five bathrooms, a kitchen, dining room, living room, gym, games room, study and a wine store and that is just the inside. Outside, the plans continue with a swimming pool, outdoor seating area, external courtyards along with a garden, pond and three space garage.

Cheltenham Architects Panel meeting agreed the design was interesting but have claimed some amendments were needed before they would be willing to except the full scheme.

Martin Horwood, ward councillor, has also expressed concerns about the new plans. He has expressed concern over the risk a new access point would cause to highways safety, though he also acknowledged it is an impressive design.

‘I’ve heard it compared to a Bond-villain lair, which may be a bit unfair, but honestly I would rather have that than a boring box,’ Wood said. ‘I also appreciate the efforts made to adapt to both the unusual setting and the landscape particularly through the use of green roofs.’

Wood added: ‘My main concern is about road safety. Sports bikes and cars descend the hill very fast and there have been multiple accidents here.

‘There’s a real risk of someone being killed or injured.’

According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), the scheme has been in the making for the past two years and has involved proactive engagement with the planning and highways authorities.

Gary Dickens, of LDRS, has also assured people the development will not have any greater impact on the Green Belt or Cotswold area of outstanding natural beauty (AONB) as it will sit within an existing structure.

Image: Taller Developments 

More on this topic:

Tickets please! Plans submitted for a new entertainment space in Wolverhampton

Plans submitted to create a London neighbourhood on a former gas site

1,900 new homes, green spaces and shops are all set to be included in the new development of the Teviot Estate in Poplar, London.

The Hill Group, an award-winning housebuilder, and Poplar HARCA, a housing association in East London, are working together to deliver the regeneration scheme which is set t cost around £800m. The development will include around 1,900 new homes with 35% affordable, new open green and play spaces, shops, community and faith facilities, alongside improved infrastructure.

Due to be delivered over four stages, the partnership has submitted an outline planning application covering what is to be expected from each stage. Phase one is set to deliver 475 homes, 45% of which will be affordable. Subject to approvals, the project is scheduled to start on site at the end of 2025, with the first homes expected to be completed by 2028. The entire project is forecast to be completed by 2042.

The masterplan for the project, designed by leading architects BPTW, covers eight hectares and offers a wide range of homes from studios and apartments to family houses. The regeneration will feature new shops and commercial spaces, as well as a new multi-use community centre. New infrastructure and public realm design focuses on creating safer streets with better pedestrian routes to Langdon Park station and a new foot-tunnel under the A12, with enhanced lighting and CCTV to help reduce anti-social behaviour.

So far, the regeneration has already invested over £400,000 to local projects through the Teviot Community Chest Fund. Over its 15-year duration, the initiative is set to generate over £278 million in social value, which covers a wide range of community projects. such as a new pontoon on the Limehouse Cut Canal, planned to open later this year that will increase community access to water sports.

Andy Hill OBE, group chief executive at The Hill Group, said: ‘The regeneration of Teviot is going to change the lives of thousands of residents, bringing high-quality homes and improved wellbeing. The community has been at the heart of the plans since conception and we are committed to delivering on our promises to residents, collaborating to create an improved neighbourhood for all. We know that people not only want better quality, energy-efficient homes, but also improved access to jobs, more support for young people and less fear of crime, so we are pleased to reach this important milestone in rewriting the future for this community.’

Paul Dooley, director of regeneration and development at Poplar HARCA, added: ‘I am really pleased to reach this significant milestone for this important regeneration scheme. It is one step closer to delivering more affordable homes and community facilities for Tower Hamlets residents.

‘In partnership with The Hill Group, the project has already made a real impact in terms of social value. Local residents have been instrumental in shaping these plans and we are committed to making sure this exciting programme of regeneration reflects the things that matter most to them.’

Image: The Hill Group

More on regeneration:

Buckinghamshire film studios plans axed despite Hollywood backing

Liverpool to undergo a major ‘Swiftie’ regeneration