Feed aggregator

Our sister publication, Air Quality News, have announced that the 2024 National Air Quality Conference will take place on Wednesday 6th November and, for the first time, will be held at London’s Prospero House.

Prospero House is located near London Bridge, directly opposite Borough Station.

This year’s event will be the fifth national conference and, as ever, it will bring together some of the most important policymakers and academics who are working on solutions to the challenges created by air pollution and clean air provision.

The exhibition will also profile organisations who are offering solutions to the challenges faced in delivering improved air quality.

Super Early Bird tickets are now on sale but they are limited in number. Use the form on this page to make the most of these best-value tickets.

The first speakers have also been announced:

Simon Birkett, Clean Air in London

Simon Birkett is the Founder and Director of Clean Air in London. He has championed full compliance with the World Health Organisation’s most recent air quality guidelines since 2006 to protect public health and the climate.  Simon was the first and only air pollution stakeholder on UNEP’s High Level Inter-Governmental and Stakeholder Advisory Group for its Sixth Global Environment Outlook between 2015 and 2019.  This was the top steering group for the United Nations’ most comprehensive report on the global environment since 2012. 

Fiona Coull, Cross River Partnership

Prior to working at Cross River Partnership (CRP), Fiona worked as a consultant on several sustainable transport and Air Quality projects, including the Mayor’s School Air Quality Audit Programme, an initiative aimed at reducing emissions and exposure at 50 primary schools in some of London’s most polluted areas.

Fiona manages CRP’s Smarter Greener Logistics programme, a Defra-funded project that aims to minimise the impact of freight on noise, air quality, traffic and pavement space in London by making improvements across 14 London boroughs and two London Business Improvement Districts. The programme also involves increasing the viability of river freight.

Diana Varaden, Imperial College London

With a decade of experience in participatory research, Dr Varaden has led numerous citizen science projects, including the successful Breathe London wearables study, which actively engaged children in research, enabling the collection of a large and unique data set. It simultaneously increased children’s awareness of air pollution, fostering positive changes in their behaviours to reduce exposure.

Dr Varaden is currently deeply involved in the development and delivery of the engagement, involvement, and participatory strategy for the WellHome study, a community-based research project dedicated to investigating indoor air pollution. Her work underscores the importance of involving non-experts in research and promoting public engagement in health and environmental issues.

Nick Ruxton-Boyle, Director of Environment, Marston Holdings

Nick is a chartered transport planner and urban mobility expert with significant professional experience spanning strategic planning to concept design and has gained a wealth of experience in both the public and private sector throughout his career. Nick was head of transport at the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, Technical Director at Project Centre and is currently now Director of Environment at Marston Holdings. He is chair of the editorial panel at the Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation. An urbanist, Nick is passionate about the role transport can play in the environment, the economy and society and is currently working on a wide range of air quality projects.

During his presentation Nick will be joined by a local authority partner to outline a detailed air quality joint project ..further details to be announced.

AQN are also in the process of acquiring experts for their traditional panel session.

If you have not attended once of the conferences before, you can find a report on last year’s National Conference here, while below is a short montage of the Northern Air Quality Conference held in Manchester in March.

Marianne Radcliffe will join the inflammatory bowel disease charity after 14 years at the learning disability charity FitzRoy

Nigel Wilcock, Executive Director of the IED, explains the government should finally grant councils the right to statutory powers. It could be the only hope form stopping more from issuing the dreaded Section 114. 

Since 2018, eight English local authorities have issued Section 114 notices which indicate that the council’s forecast income is insufficient to meet its forecast expenditure for the next year, as the sector’s coffers reach breaking point.

Nigel Wilcock

More worrying, but not surprising, is almost one in five council leaders and chief executives in England surveyed by the Local Government Association (LGA) last year think that it is very or fairly likely that their chief finance officer will need to issue such a notice this year or next due to a lack of funding to keep key services running.

The magnitude of this issue, most notably at Birmingham City Council, has made front-page news. In fact, four councils in the past 12 months have declared themselves in effect bankrupt, while more have signalled drastic spending cuts as they attempt to avoid potential insolvency.

Now, this is attracting political attention at the highest level, including through the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee report on Financial distress in local authorities, published in February. In this report, the cross-party committee said that Ministers must urgently inject £4 billion into English town hall budgets to head off an ‘out of control’ financial crisis that threatens to drag well-run councils into bankruptcy and put local services at risk.

For now, following the initial Local Government Financial Settlement, councils in England have been handed an extra £600 million in funding to tackle the worsening financial crises, with £500 million available for social care, alongside a further £100 million in other funding guarantees and grants. Taking into account this new funding, Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove reported that the top-up in the financial package for English councils meant an overall increase in their budgets of up to £4.5bn next year.

Whilst the LGA has said that it will ‘continue to work with government to achieve a sustainable long-term funding settlement and updated distribution mechanisms, as well as legislative reform where needed, so that local government can play its full part in delivering inclusive prosperity and growth through investment to support people, places, and the planet’, we need to think bigger about our collective approach to council income-generation activity. This, in turn, links directly to the biggest issue facing this country.

Sustainable economic growth is urgently required to help deliver the funding for government to tackle significant areas of under-investment. With an aging population this will require significant improvements in productivity but at present the UK economy is flatlining and the high inflation of 2022 and 2023 has impacted on living standards and consumer expenditure. Serious questions are now being asked about current approaches to stimulating growth.

The nationally-led approach to stimulating growth has under-delivered for decades, and the National Audit Office found that since 1975 successive governments have introduced more than 55 separate policies targeting economic growth in England, with £18bn being spent between 2011 and 2020 alone. Put simply, this is not working, and it is time to enable effective action to drive economic growth that is locally led.

With the government transferring Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) to local government, the pivotal economic role of councils for realising the country’s growth ambitions has been articulated. This is why the Institute of Economic Development (IED) has recently launched its Grow Local, Grow National manifesto for change calling for councils to be given statutory powers over economic development so they can help create high-quality jobs, attract investment into local areas, and turbocharge the UK plc.

Giving local authorities a legal duty over economic development would create a clear accountability structure, which in turn would make it simpler and more attractive to UK and international firms and financial institutions to invest in places. It would also enable the development of local strategic economic development plans that respond to the views of local businesses, as well as the wider community.

Enhanced local focus on tackling stagnant growth and inequalities, in particular through resources invested in regeneration and boosting residents’ skills, would be facilitated and council staff upskilled with the tools and knowledge to help drive real economic growth.

With the right level of resources, councils can stimulate growth across the country, addressing the social, regional and financial inequalities that exist between places, delivering the productivity our economy so desperately needs.

Economic development’s role in understanding the drivers of growth and the needs of communities is clear, but the detailed work required to create positive change requires local understanding.

Without recognition as a statutory function, the importance of economic development can be under-prioritised as difficult funding decisions are made, although in the medium term a solid economic development strategy can create the foundations on which local areas can improve financial performance. A strong economic development function can also ensure government priorities in areas such as levelling up are developed more effectively at the local level.

The IED believes that it is only through this approach that national policies can be consistently implemented at a local level – and that economic development can make a difference to residents of areas at the local level. Alongside this overarching call to action are a series of recommendations (read our full manifesto for the detailed asks) sitting within six supporting pillars which we deem critical for success.

These six pillars include:

1. Devolution

As increasing local devolution moves up the political agenda, it will be essential for local authorities to have in place the models to ensure that local evidence can be gained, effective policies developed and implementation delivered.

2.     Funding and Pipeline Stability

Underpinning all economic development and associated projects is a requirement for a more stable and long-term funding landscape.

3.     Net Zero

The IED fully supports the mission of the Blueprint Coalition’s Manifesto for Local Climate Action, a core part to this being recognition of the need for a place-based approach to tackle climate change and move towards net zero.

4.     Business Development, Trade and Inward Investment

Growing our businesses, attracting investment into our local areas and supporting exports is a fundamental part of any locality’s economic development remit, helping to increase pay, employment and productivity.

5.     Labour Market and Skills Activation

A statutory economic development function would be involved in assessing local skills, key sectors and provide skills intelligence for local skills providers, employers and the workforce. Skills development, workforce assessment and the development of clear pathways into work would be a key element of the economic strategy.

6.     Workforce and CPD

Legal duty for economic development remit would need to be underpinned by an experienced and stable workforce. Under-investment in economic development and funding settlements for local authorities has meant important economic development skills have been lost to the profession and there is a need to rebuild them.

It is no surprise that both the government and opposition parties have made growing the economy a key focus for the forthcoming general election.

With a stagnating economy, and as increasing local devolution moves up the political agenda, it is essential for local areas to have in place the economic development models to ensure local evidence can be gained, effective policies developed and implementation delivered.

This is the core role of any economic development function and it seems unthinkable that despite moves towards devolution, economic development is not one of those areas deemed as a statutory responsibility of each local authority.

Councils could deliver so much more if they were given statutory powers, with their unique understanding of local economies, to better ensure policies are adapted to local conditions and make the most of the strengths of local places.

Having discussed our manifesto with key decision-makers, and with more Westminster meetings held or scheduled, we welcome further engagement with all parties to improve decisions on economic and industrial strategy development, leveraging the unique experience the economic development profession has of delivery.

We call on all parties to recognise the critically important role that economic development practitioners have in delivering levelling up and place-based economic transformation.

Images: Hansjörg Keller, Nigel Wilcock and 

More features:

How Google Ad Grant funding could save charities

The details in the data

The regulator says that although it did not find improper conduct by the trustees of the Effective Ventures Foundation, it was not always clear in what capacity the trustees were acting

He plans to step down in October after 13 years as the think tank’s chief

PurpleSpace will operate as its own entity under the Scope umbrella

Deputy Prime Minister makes a speech at the London Defence Conference on resilience.

The Good Law Project wants the Charity Commission to investigate the Institute of Economic Affairs; the IEA says the GLP is ‘wrong about the facts of charity law’

Ben Kernighan was deputy chief executive of the NCVO from 2010 to 2013 before becoming group chief executive of the National Union of Students

The awards celebrate the work of charities and the difference they make to society

The steering group behind the Charity Governance Code says it needs to secure funding in order to 'enhance the code in the future with an engaging website and tools'

Statement from the Minister for the Cabinet Office on the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme

Sir Robert Francis has been appointed by the Government following the Infected Blood Inquiry's final report.

Information about the Infected Blood Compensation Framework Study undertaken by Sir Robert Francis QC.

The Minister for the Cabinet Office has published the Terms of Reference of the Infected Blood Inquiry Response Expert Group

Authorities in the capital city have voiced their concerns over shortcomings in government plans for regulating the short-term and holiday lets sector, warning they could exacerbate the housing crisis.

This morning, Tuesday 21st May 2024, a letter to housing secretary Michael Gove from London Councils was made public, which highlights the government’s proposal to create a new planning ‘use class’ for properties already used as short-term lets.

The new planning rules for short-term let properties were first introduced in February 2019 with an aim to freeing up more affordable housing for locals. They are due to come into place ‘this summer’.

However, the cross-party group have claimed that transferring short-term lets into this new planning category under permitted development rights will see thousands of homes removed from London’s permanent housing stock. London Councils estimates there are at least 43,000 short-term lets in the capital, which is equivalent to one in every 85 London homes.

Although, despite apprehensions, London Councils have welcomed other aspects of the government’s action on short-term lets. This includes introducing a much-needed regulation and oversight of the sector. These include a mandatory national register of properties and continued planning permission requirements for future short-term lets.

Despite this, London Councils argue that reclassifying existing short-term lets into a new planning category – the ‘C5’ use class – without requiring planning permission undermines efforts to preserve homes for residents amid worsening housing pressures and homelessness rates.

Research that was published last year by the cross-party group found a 41% in reduction in the number of London properties available for private rent since the Covid-19 pandemic, although data from the Office of National Statistics shows London private rents increased 7% in the year to 2024 – the highest jump on record – and the new change in planning rules could hinder progress.

Commenting on the news, Cllr Darren Rodwell, of London Councils, said although government plans mean well, the blanket reclassification of existing short-term lets into a new use class could strip the capital of thousands of homes.’

‘For too many years the short-term lets market has been growing out of control,’ Cllr Rodwell said. ‘With housing and homelessness pressures in the capital worse than ever, boroughs are extremely concerned about losing permanent housing stock. The priority has to be ensuring homes are available for long-term residents.’

Cllr Rodwell added: ‘Boroughs are keen to work with ministers on developing these proposals further and ensuring London is better placed to tackle this challenge.’

Image: Robbie Duncan

More on this topic:

London Councils bridge together to avoid ‘bidding wars’

‘No rest until every Londoner safe’ says London Councils on Grenfell Tower anniversary

Deputy Prime Minister, Oliver Dowden, publishes updated guidance on the use of powers under the National Security and Investment Act (2021)

The section 3 statement sets out how the Secretary of State expects to exercise powers under the NSI Act to call-in certain acquisitions for scrutiny.

The topics in the Market Guidance are based on analysis of the notifications received under the NSI Act and feedback from stakeholders on their experience of the system.

This guidance helps higher education and other research organisations understand the scope of the National Security and Investment Act.